According to a pretty awesome study performed by Scarborough Research for its “Understanding the Digital Savvy Consumer” paper (Extreme PDF Warning!) six percent of the US defined as “Digital Savvy”. And yes, I did just describe a quantitative study as “awesome”. That’s so unlike me, normally I only attribute such traits to qualitative research.
And now that the stupid joke is out of the way, let’s talk about the research. Fundamentally the researchers questioned thousands of people to determine their tech use and depending on how geeky the answers turned out, each person was assigned a level of “Digital Savvy”.
First, let’s run through the items that determine geekiness.
Do you own
- PDA
- Digital Video Recorder
- Satellite Radio Subscription
- VoIP
- Mp3 Player
- HDTV
How do you use the internet?
- Online banking
- Reading/contributing to blogs
- Games
- Podcasts
- Music
- Video
- IM
How do you use your cell phone?
- Download ringtones/games
- Text
- Video
- Other internet
Anyway, the research gets really interesting by comparing other traits between the “Digital Savvy” and general US. To simplify things from now on we’ll deem these terms “techno-awesome” and “weirdo-neo-luddites”. Ok, this might be too tricky… let’s just go with “Digital Savvy” and “General Consumer”.
It turns out that the digital savvy consumer is, unsurprisingly, more likely to be: a wealthy, upperclass, white collar, college graduate. I probably could have told you this.
But what I did find surprising was a few strange traits attributed to the digital savvy consumer.
For example: the digital savvy consumer is about twice as likely to have a broadband internet connection than the general consumer. This makes sense. What doesn’t make sense is that 3% of digital savvy consumers have NO internet connection.
Another one that confused me: the digital savvy consumer is about 18% more likely to be an NFL fan and nearly 50% more likely to be an NHL fan. This has to be wrong. (Although I think it’s great that the digital savvy is about twice as likely to be a soccer fan!)
Here’s another confusing one: 6% of digital savvy respondents spent less than $100 online last year. Have they never even heard of the SomethingStore?
Finally, according to page 42 the digital savvy consumer is almost twice as likely to visit ESPN than Google. Bull. Shit. Now I love The Sports Guy as much as anyone, but to get the link I just included- I found it through Google, not my bookmark.
And now to explain my confusion over all of these findings: I’m extremely biased.
Personally, I score a whopping 94% (I don’t understand the value of satellite radio, but aced the rest of this puppy) on the test above, would likely put me more on the “overwhelmingly geeky” end of the “digital savvy” scale (which according to slide 66 is only .1% of the US). I’m so far removed from the general consumer that I’ve lost touch with reality, apparently.
But still, how can you be digitally savvy and not have internet connection? And no matter what, I can’t believe that a vast majority of the digitally savvy are such huge sports fans. And there is no way in hell that one in six of all digital savvy Americans live in Texas! I call this research debunked. DEBUNKED!



May 29th, 2008 at 11:29 am
Well, I have an internet connection at work, as well as a BlackBerry for work, but no internet at home. I think this qualifies me as not having internet, since I don’t pay for it. The reason why I can get by without having internet is because I’m ‘techno-awesome.’ Am I in that mysterious 3%?
Also, somethingstore is incredible. I know what everyone in my family is getting for Christmas this year.
“David, nice of you to get me a gift, what is it?”
“I have no idea!”
May 29th, 2008 at 12:25 pm
@Dave
If I remember correctly, you have (or did have) satellite radio…
And I thought about your situation and agree. This is probably how the research was done “Do you pay for home internet”- so even people that have unlimited data packs on PDAs and EVDO cards in laptops, technically would answer “no internet”… hmmm. DEBUNKED!
May 30th, 2008 at 10:40 am
First off - great post.
2nd off - @Dave…hilarious joke about the Christmas present idea - I laughed for a solid minute after I read that.
3rd off - some general comments.
A. The whole NFL fan / NHL fan percentage thing. The only reason this occured is because somehow owning an HDTV is “digital savy”. Sorry, but owning an HDTV is not “digital savy”. All of our parents have them and you know most of them are not “digital savy”. So getting to the point, people who have HDTVs are more likely to be sports fans…yada yada yada you can do the rest of the math yourself. Side note - hockey in HD is far and away the biggest upgrade than any other sport from SD.
B. This relates to point A, but some of those categories are just not good. Downloading ringtones does not make you digital savy, it makes you a 13 year old girl. VoIP? I think 7 people have that. Wait, I just counted and it’s 6.
Basically, I love the idea of the research, but it seems as if the research was done by someone who isn’t “digital savy”! That is kind of ironic isn’t it?
May 30th, 2008 at 11:30 am
@Drew-
Exactly! You’d think that the people doing this study had a big more digital savviness in themselves… but I think you’re absolutely right.
Some weirdo who has a 19″ 480 Westinghouse, pays for Satellite radio, and downloads a Sweet Home Alabama ringtone.. this person is digital savvy? Maybe, I guess…